Part 2: Cabeese, MOW, and other equipment, OH MY!

 Since I was on a roll with decals for the two industrial railroads, another languishing project has been getting some GNW cabooses and other equipment painted and lettered. You may have noticed in the photos, the GWN has been using SP equipment and cabeese. This needs to change! 

Of note, the GNW has 2 paint schemes for their cabooses. One is a kind of orange, reminiscent of the D&RGW; the other is a classic "red caboose" theme. Both use the same lettering size, but one uses black lettering, and the other uses white. 


 

Neither had the GNW logo, so the new decals would take care of that deficiency!

I had previously worked with Circus City to make up GNW decals for engines. So I reached out to him for this rolling stock. I was mostly interested in packing in as many GNW logos and lettering as I could, since I could get things like equipment data decals fairly easily and at a much lower cost per sheet. So working with Matt over at Circus City, we came up with a sheet that included a number of sizes of logos and lettering. Then came the question of numbers. Numbers.

Well... In the past I would piece together numbers to make things the way I wanted them to. With custom decals that is no longer a problem. I can set up the "number jumbles" to make whatever number sets I want. But what numbers? In the past, frankly, I got lazy and often just picked a series of numbers that looked OK. That would never do now! So off to a spreadsheet to come up with the railroad's numbering scheme.

I pored through SP, GN, ATSF and even private car owner rosters to see what they had done. (Sorry UP, you are not on the list.) There really was not a whole lot of magic to things. Types of cars each had various series of numbers assigned to them. Nothing too magical, other than it was defined. A lot of the bigger RRs are using 6 character number sets. Since the GNW intends to be a scrappy bridge line, they would likely not have that much private equipment. And even the IPD box car craze did not necessarily require the creation of 6-character car numbers, even for the more well-known lessors. I also did not like the look of 4 or fewer numbers. That went too far the other way; to me at least. 

Over lunch, I pulled out an excel spreadsheet and mused together a conceptual equipment series index based on the major groupings and types of cars extant in the 1950's thru the 1980's. 

Why the gap to get to cabooses? Well, because I had lettered several of my cabooses with a "07" prefix and I did not want to redo them!

So off to put together groups of numbers that would give me plenty of caboose numbers, MOW numbers; and box car, tank car, flat and hopper car numbers. Sent off to Circus City and... wa-la... back they came with this:

 

Will print this in both black and white. This will give me plenty of options. A bit like a kid on Christmas Eve - cannot wait for these decals to get here!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let’s Configure a Node – The Beauty of LCC (With a bonus section on connecting LCC to PanelPro)

Image
Recall one of the drivers for trying out LCC was to avoid writing detailed code.   Yes, I ~can~ write code.   But it is not my interest or hobby.   As such, anything that can help me translate what is in my head to implementation on a chip somewhere with as little brain damage as possible is quite welcome in my book.   Additionally I did not want the brains of the layout to live in a PC.   There are days when I just want to come down to the basement, flip on the power switch, and run trains.   And… if I am going to go through the trouble of having signals, I want them to come up and operating properly immediately.   Yea, I know I can set up a PC to boot up, execute the right programs and get running on its own.   Sorta.   It’s just one more piece of equipment and step I just don’t care to deal with.        Anyway…. So a big part of my hesitation of leaping into LCC was the angst associated with programming ...
Read more

Configuring Push-buttons for Turnout Control in LCC (with BONUS section on Adapting JMRI for Feedback)

Image
So ALL the efforts, costs, brain damage and such to get LCC integrated into the layout is paying off in this one new step.  Let me explain. With LCC, each node is essentially its very own stand-alone microprocessor, capable of processing commands INDEPENDENTLY of a central PC or other server.  It just is connected to at the CAN bus, either looking for commands to respond (consumer) to or to issue them (producer).  SO... this addresses one of the goals of integrating LCC into my layout.  Sometimes I like to come down into the layout room and just run trains.  I don't have others with me, and for me, its a great way to unwind.  When I do that, I don't want to have to futz with turning on a PC and getting it going.  Ya, I know, some say it is not that big of a deal.  But if I am only going to be there for 5 or 15 minutes, seems like a hassle to mess with that.  I just want to through the power switch on, have the layout come to life, and run s...
Read more

LCC and Wiring Continues

Image
Slower than desired, but better to do it right now than try to fiddle it in later.... In my last staging yard, I never did install feeders.  Instead I just counted on the continuity of the turnouts to carry power to each of the 16 staging tracks.  Bad idea.  ~Most~ stayed powered up over the 10 or so years it operated.  ~Some~ randomly dropped out... necessitating fishing and soldering wires onto tracks with 7" spacing between decks.  Not uber-fun at all. SO... with GNW Phase 3, I promised myself ALL track would have feeders every 6' (one feeder per 2 sticks of flex), plus additional feeders in any other complex areas such as yard throats.  This would also allow me to have every other stick of flex not have to be soldered at the track jointers, allowing for expansion and contraction of the benchwork.  BUT... this comes at a cost.  Instead of 16 single ended tracks, I elected to have a 9-track staging yard, each track capable of holding 3 tra...
Read more